00:00
00:00
Oh-Sama
I'm not really an artist. I find it hard to make art. So I Fake ART, and I FART. I guess I'm a Fartist.

Age 32, Male

Student

The World

Like I know

Joined on 12/10/09

Level:
27
Exp Points:
8,038 / 8,090
Exp Rank:
4,795
Vote Power:
6.90 votes
Audio Scouts
2
Art Scouts
10+
Rank:
Police Captain
Global Rank:
4,102
Blams:
63
Saves:
2,114
B/P Bonus:
16%
Whistle:
Normal
Trophies:
4
Medals:
1,111
Supporter:
1m

Comments

- If the problem is unidentifiable, then you cannot know that's it's a problem. It would just be what it is, status quo, truth, reality. A thing is just a thing, to make something more than what it is, is to change that thing from what it really is.
- If the problem has no solution because no one can solve it, at least there is fundamental understanding that we don't understand it. It might not be solved now, but with more information and experience, we can re-evaluate and be able to look at the problem in a different way to understand it better, at first coming with a solution that works for now, then eventually a solution that works best.
- If the problem is complex because it is not simple, it could still be easy. The easiness or hardness of a problem is not necessarily related to it's complexity, but our understanding of what makes it complex or simple. Facing complexities is what makes us learn.
- To say a problem is wicked because it is evil, is to force judgement on a thing that cannot be judged. The very act of calling something a problem forces an implication that there is a solution. Good and evil do not have solutions, so forcing the perspective of good and evil onto a problem would make it unsolvable because that problem then no longer exists as a problem thus, no solution.

So the "Unidentifiable non-solvable complex and wicked problem" could also be called the "Reality we don't fully understand, but that which we can observe and learn from"

Thank you for your feed back.
What I meant here by the word unidentifiable is this:
The problem can still be identified as a problem from a smaller perspective because its effects are known or experienced but the smaller perspective is still unable to see the big picture and thus the problem or challenge is still unseen as a whole. So this way it can be both identifiable and unidentifiable. But the truth is that the problem is no problem at all as seen by an experienced self that knows most if not all of that which shall be known....